Lead-in image

Frost/Nixon: Phone Call

June 5th, 2009, under ,

I watched Frost/Nixon yesterday, and followed it with some light research on the film’s historical accuracy. As suspected, quite a bit was invented, rearranged and reinterpreted.

There is one particular topic which jumps out over and over again in the general discussion of the film’s relationship with historical reality: Nixon’s late night phone call to Frost. The question repeatedly asked is whether this phone call really took place. The answer, unsurprisingly, is “no” (see for instance here, here and here).

Now, my research hasn’t been that extensive, but I am surprised that I haven’t seen anyone asking whether the phone call actually took place in the film’s own reality. And I would suggest that it in fact didn’t.

The call is preceded by Caroline about to go down to the hotel’s restaurant to get Frost and herself something to eat. She asks Frost whether he would like fish or a steak, but Frost being in a highly emotional state, she decides that she’ll call him from the restaurant instead.

When the phone finally rings, Frost has made up his mind: it will be neither fish nor steak, but cheeseburgers, and this is what he says into the receiver. However, instead of hearing Caroline’s voice, he gets a rambling Nixon.

After the Nixon call is over, Caroline enters the hotel room bringing cheeseburgers. There are two things to note here. One is that we have not actually been shown Frost telling Caroline that he wants cheeseburgers and not steak or fish, yet she somehow knows that it is cheeseburgers that Frost wants. Even more interestingly, Caroline does not mention that the phone line was busy when she tried to call from the restaurant, which should have been the case had the Nixon call actually taken place.

The way I therefore see it is that it was actually Caroline who called, and Frost due to his exhaustion or desperation or whatever imagined the whole Nixon thing. This also explains why Nixon cannot remember the phone call — it didn’t take place.

This would also make sense considering the way the scene is set up, with Caroline’s coming and going, and the careful references to steaks, fish and cheeseburgers. Her trip to the restaurant would otherwise seem narratively unnecessary, but now it has a clear function. It also explains why at the very end we as the audience are reminded about not only the phone call and the fact that Nixon cannot remember it, but also specifically about the cheeseburgers.

If you interpret the scene in this way, and I don’t say that you absolutely have to, you can perhaps take it as a reference to subjective interpretation of history, and as such see it as the film’s commentary on itself.

Vertebrate Silence box   4 Responses  Vertebrate Silence box


Comments

  1. JK

    August 9th, 2009 (permalink)

    Thanks! I don’t see any responses, so I thought I’d leave you one. To me it had seemed they had taken artistic license too far in placing a fictional phone call in a film that purports to be historical. Having read your explanation, I’m leaning on the side of your theory. I usually don’t miss these kinds of things, but I think Ron Howard was a bit too subtle in this detail.

    I’ve just read the wikipedia article which reprints some criticisms claiming that the movie was edited and the events rearranged in such a way as to make it appear that Nixon’s final outpouring was more profound and meaningful than it actually was. One critic goes so far as to say that Nixon revealed only what he’d planned beforehand.

    I’m no fan of Nixon, but I’m coming to believe the screenplay gives false view of history. The misleading enactment of this phone call is just a start…

    Thanks again,

    JK

  2. vili

    August 9th, 2009 (permalink)

    Thanks for the comment, JK. You are right, the film (and the stage play that it is based on) apparently took several liberties with historical accuracy. Whether that is a bad thing or a good thing or just a thing is a matter of debate.

  3. JK

    August 9th, 2009 (permalink)

    Hi Vili,

    Well, *I* was kind of disappointed to discover that much of the drama of the interviews was manufactured, even in the editing of the original 90-min version of the Watergate interviews. But I’ll get over it.

    I like your blog, btw. I read through a year or two’s worth of posts last night and we have many interests in common (w/ the notable exception of R&B music :) I even got addicted to Chain Factor! (My current high score is 160K).

    I’ll try to stop back from time to time.

    -Joe

  4. vili

    August 10th, 2009 (permalink)

    Ah, Chain Factor. I actually just played it last week, after having successfully stayed clean for almost half a year. Such a brilliant game it is. It’s just a bit depressing to notice how high the high scores are these days, and how difficult it is make it to the list.

    My favourite power, by the way, is the one that eliminates sequences that are prime numbers.



Related posts

• Mobile phones and the public health (again)
• Nessie was an elephant?
• Raiders of the Lost Ark
• Lantana as a murder mystery
• About

 

Links relevant to this post

RSS feed for comments on this post

TrackBack URI


 

Social bookmarking

Large del.icio.us logo Large Reddit logo Large Digg logo Large Stumbleopun logo Large Newsvine logo Large Yahoo! MyWeb logo

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required but not made public)




Lead-out image